Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The Calcutta High Court addressed the issue of condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 107 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The appeal was found to be barred by limitation and lacked an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Court referred to a previous case to determine the scope of Section 107 and the applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act. It was concluded that the Appellate Authority retains the power to condone delay beyond the prescribed period of limitation under Section 107(4) of the Act. Another case was cited to emphasize that the statute does not prohibit the Appellate Authority from exercising jurisdiction beyond the prescribed limitation period. The Court set aside the Appellate Authority's observation that condonation of delay is only possible within one month from the prescribed period. Ultimately, no relief was granted to the petitioner, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.
The Calcutta High Court addressed the issue of condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 107 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The appeal was found to be barred by limitation and lacked an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Court referred to a previous case to determine the scope of Section 107 and the applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act. It was concluded that the Appellate Authority retains the power to condone delay beyond the prescribed period of limitation under Section 107(4) of the Act. Another case was cited to emphasize that the statute does not prohibit the Appellate Authority from exercising jurisdiction beyond the prescribed limitation period. The Court set aside the Appellate Authority's observation that condonation of delay is only possible within one month from the prescribed period. Ultimately, no relief was granted to the petitioner, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
