Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The Delhi High Court issued a Restraint Order on a locker, which the bank objected to due to lack of the official Revocation Order from the Income Tax Department. The Court noted that the Revocation Order dated 17th October, 2012 was served on the bank manager, confirming its authenticity. As the Restraint Order on the locker was revoked by the Income Tax Department, the petitioners are directed to be granted access to their locker. The bank must remove the Restraint Order and allow the petitioners to access their lawful assets.
The Delhi High Court issued a Restraint Order on a locker, which the bank objected to due to lack of the official Revocation Order from the Income Tax Department. The Court noted that the Revocation Order dated 17th October, 2012 was served on the bank manager, confirming its authenticity. As the Restraint Order on the locker was revoked by the Income Tax Department, the petitioners are directed to be granted access to their locker. The bank must remove the Restraint Order and allow the petitioners to access their lawful assets.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.