Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The Delhi High Court issued a Restraint Order on a locker, which the bank objected to due to lack of the official Revocation Order from the Income Tax Department. The Court noted that the Revocation Order dated 17th October, 2012 was served on the bank manager, confirming its authenticity. As the Restraint Order on the locker was revoked by the Income Tax Department, the petitioners are directed to be granted access to their locker. The bank must remove the Restraint Order and allow the petitioners to access their lawful assets.
The Delhi High Court issued a Restraint Order on a locker, which the bank objected to due to lack of the official Revocation Order from the Income Tax Department. The Court noted that the Revocation Order dated 17th October, 2012 was served on the bank manager, confirming its authenticity. As the Restraint Order on the locker was revoked by the Income Tax Department, the petitioners are directed to be granted access to their locker. The bank must remove the Restraint Order and allow the petitioners to access their lawful assets.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
