Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
The case involves TDS issues u/s 194A, 194H, and 194J concerning surplus interest retained by NBFCs. The assessee, a bank, purchased loans from NBFCs with a tripartite agreement allowing NBFCs to retain part interest. The tribunal held that the retained interest does not qualify as "interest" u/s 194A as the assessee did not borrow funds from NBFCs. Similarly, no TDS is required u/s 194H as NBFCs did not act on behalf of the assessee. Regarding u/s 194J, the consideration for loan assignment includes upfront payment and lower interest, not subject to TDS. Tax u/s 201(1) and interest u/s 201(1A) are not applicable as NBFCs already paid tax on interest earned. Decision favors the assessee.
The case involves TDS issues u/s 194A, 194H, and 194J concerning surplus interest retained by NBFCs. The assessee, a bank, purchased loans from NBFCs with a tripartite agreement allowing NBFCs to retain part interest. The tribunal held that the retained interest does not qualify as "interest" u/s 194A as the assessee did not borrow funds from NBFCs. Similarly, no TDS is required u/s 194H as NBFCs did not act on behalf of the assessee. Regarding u/s 194J, the consideration for loan assignment includes upfront payment and lower interest, not subject to TDS. Tax u/s 201(1) and interest u/s 201(1A) are not applicable as NBFCs already paid tax on interest earned. Decision favors the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.