Undisclosed foreign asset classification requires an unexplained source; unrebutted affidavits and corroborative evidence defeated the Black Money Act...
Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involves TDS issues u/s 194A, 194H, and 194J concerning surplus interest retained by NBFCs. The assessee, a bank, purchased loans from NBFCs with a tripartite agreement allowing NBFCs to retain part interest. The tribunal held that the retained interest does not qualify as "interest" u/s 194A as the assessee did not borrow funds from NBFCs. Similarly, no TDS is required u/s 194H as NBFCs did not act on behalf of the assessee. Regarding u/s 194J, the consideration for loan assignment includes upfront payment and lower interest, not subject to TDS. Tax u/s 201(1) and interest u/s 201(1A) are not applicable as NBFCs already paid tax on interest earned. Decision favors the assessee.
The case involves TDS issues u/s 194A, 194H, and 194J concerning surplus interest retained by NBFCs. The assessee, a bank, purchased loans from NBFCs with a tripartite agreement allowing NBFCs to retain part interest. The tribunal held that the retained interest does not qualify as "interest" u/s 194A as the assessee did not borrow funds from NBFCs. Similarly, no TDS is required u/s 194H as NBFCs did not act on behalf of the assessee. Regarding u/s 194J, the consideration for loan assignment includes upfront payment and lower interest, not subject to TDS. Tax u/s 201(1) and interest u/s 201(1A) are not applicable as NBFCs already paid tax on interest earned. Decision favors the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.