Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involves TDS issues u/s 194A, 194H, and 194J concerning surplus interest retained by NBFCs. The assessee, a bank, purchased loans from NBFCs with a tripartite agreement allowing NBFCs to retain part interest. The tribunal held that the retained interest does not qualify as "interest" u/s 194A as the assessee did not borrow funds from NBFCs. Similarly, no TDS is required u/s 194H as NBFCs did not act on behalf of the assessee. Regarding u/s 194J, the consideration for loan assignment includes upfront payment and lower interest, not subject to TDS. Tax u/s 201(1) and interest u/s 201(1A) are not applicable as NBFCs already paid tax on interest earned. Decision favors the assessee.
The case involves TDS issues u/s 194A, 194H, and 194J concerning surplus interest retained by NBFCs. The assessee, a bank, purchased loans from NBFCs with a tripartite agreement allowing NBFCs to retain part interest. The tribunal held that the retained interest does not qualify as "interest" u/s 194A as the assessee did not borrow funds from NBFCs. Similarly, no TDS is required u/s 194H as NBFCs did not act on behalf of the assessee. Regarding u/s 194J, the consideration for loan assignment includes upfront payment and lower interest, not subject to TDS. Tax u/s 201(1) and interest u/s 201(1A) are not applicable as NBFCs already paid tax on interest earned. Decision favors the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
