Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Rule 46A compliance requires a speaking order and opportunity to rebut before additional evidence is used in appeal.
    Share valuation under section 56(2)(viib) must be done afresh for each issue of unquoted equity shares, the ITAT held.
    Section 10AA, bad debts and section 41(1) rulings turn on export proof, write-off evidence and capital liability adjustment.
    Common area maintenance recoveries justify business expenditure allowance and limit apportionment against rental income claims.
    DCF share valuation cannot be replaced without defect; protective addition fails when taxability uncertainty is absent.
    Place of effective management must rest on proved facts, not institutional deference; global income addition deleted.
    Permanent establishment through branch office continuity led to remand for fresh profit attribution and taxability review.
    Section 87A rebate applies under the new tax regime even where tax arises on short-term capital gains under section 111A.
    Protective assessment and TDS credit issues remanded for fresh verification of ownership, exemption eligibility, and income nexus.
    Arm's length remuneration for a dependent agent PE bars further profit attribution under Rule 10.
    Natural justice and customs broker liability: penalty set aside for lack of factual findings and ignored binding precedents.
    Customs penalty for smuggled gold sustained where notice clearly set out abetment, dealing, and prohibited-goods liability.
    Penalty under Section 112 fails where knowledge, admissible statements, and incriminating evidence are not proved against the Customs Broker's directo...
    Prospective amendment to customs IGST law barred interest, redemption fine and penalty for the unamended period.
    Classification of food seasoning as a mixture of odoriferous substances upheld; reclassification under a food preparations heading rejected.
    Technical classification of imported goods as limestone justified denial of marble exemption, confiscation, and penalties.
    Statutory inquiry and fraud threshold: defective inspection report and unsupported SFIO investigation were both quashed.
    Condonation of delay in share transfer disputes upheld where illness-based explanation and medical evidence showed sufficient cause.
    Provident fund protection in liquidation excludes employee dues from the estate and blocks waterfall distribution.
    Pre-existing dispute defeats insolvency claim; disputed advance refund and forfeiture kept Section 9 petition out of time.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The case before the Calcutta High Court involved the...

Court Rules Company as Foreign Entity for Tax Purposes, Aligns with India-Netherlands Tax Agreement Provisions.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax May 25, 2024 Case Laws HC
The case before the Calcutta High Court involved the classification of a company for taxation purposes. The court determined that the appellant company did not qualify as a domestic company but fell under the category of "a company other than a domestic company." The court relied on the definitions provided in the Income Tax Act, 1961 to make this classification. The court also addressed the issue of taxation rates, highlighting the distinction between domestic and foreign companies. The court found that the appellant was liable to be taxed at the rate applicable to a company other than a domestic company. Additionally, the court analyzed the relationship between the domestic tax laws and the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) with the Netherlands. It concluded that there was no conflict between the Explanation to Section 90 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Article 24(2) of the DTAA.

Topics

Acts Income Tax