Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In the case before Patna High Court, the issue was the condonation of delay in filing an appeal under sections 73 and 74 of the BGST Act. The court held that appeals under these sections must be filed by a specified date. However, it was noted that appeals pending before the authority could still be considered properly filed, even if there was a delay. The court ordered the appeal to be restored to the authority's files, subject to certain conditions being met by the petitioner. The impugned order was set aside, with the petitioner required to fulfill the conditions by a specified deadline for the appeal to be considered on its merits. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
In the case before Patna High Court, the issue was the condonation of delay in filing an appeal under sections 73 and 74 of the BGST Act. The court held that appeals under these sections must be filed by a specified date. However, it was noted that appeals pending before the authority could still be considered properly filed, even if there was a delay. The court ordered the appeal to be restored to the authority's files, subject to certain conditions being met by the petitioner. The impugned order was set aside, with the petitioner required to fulfill the conditions by a specified deadline for the appeal to be considered on its merits. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
