Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In the case before Patna High Court, the issue was the condonation of delay in filing an appeal under sections 73 and 74 of the BGST Act. The court held that appeals under these sections must be filed by a specified date. However, it was noted that appeals pending before the authority could still be considered properly filed, even if there was a delay. The court ordered the appeal to be restored to the authority's files, subject to certain conditions being met by the petitioner. The impugned order was set aside, with the petitioner required to fulfill the conditions by a specified deadline for the appeal to be considered on its merits. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
In the case before Patna High Court, the issue was the condonation of delay in filing an appeal under sections 73 and 74 of the BGST Act. The court held that appeals under these sections must be filed by a specified date. However, it was noted that appeals pending before the authority could still be considered properly filed, even if there was a delay. The court ordered the appeal to be restored to the authority's files, subject to certain conditions being met by the petitioner. The impugned order was set aside, with the petitioner required to fulfill the conditions by a specified deadline for the appeal to be considered on its merits. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
