Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The case involves a dispute regarding the eligibility of deduction u/s 80IB for profits derived from repairs and maintenance services of moulds in an industrial undertaking. The court held that to qualify for the deduction, the industrial undertaking must derive profits from the manufacture or production of any article or thing. The receipts from repairs and maintenance were found to lack a direct nexus with the manufacturing activity, as evidenced by the absence of related contracts or documentation. Therefore, the profits from repairs and maintenance were deemed ineligible for deduction u/s 80IB, emphasizing that the deduction is limited to profits derived from the actual manufacturing or production activity of the industrial undertaking.
The case involves a dispute regarding the eligibility of deduction u/s 80IB for profits derived from repairs and maintenance services of moulds in an industrial undertaking. The court held that to qualify for the deduction, the industrial undertaking must derive profits from the manufacture or production of any article or thing. The receipts from repairs and maintenance were found to lack a direct nexus with the manufacturing activity, as evidenced by the absence of related contracts or documentation. Therefore, the profits from repairs and maintenance were deemed ineligible for deduction u/s 80IB, emphasizing that the deduction is limited to profits derived from the actual manufacturing or production activity of the industrial undertaking.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.