Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
In the case before ITAT Delhi, the issue revolved around the computation of commission income on credit entries and unexplained cash credit u/s 68. The assessee failed to substantiate the source of cash deposits but argued that he has only earned commission income on the entries provided by him. The Tribunal, considering previous rulings, treated the assessee as an Entry Operator and determined commission at 0.15% on the disputed amount. The AO was directed to charge commission accordingly.
In the case before ITAT Delhi, the issue revolved around the computation of commission income on credit entries and unexplained cash credit u/s 68. The assessee failed to substantiate the source of cash deposits but argued that he has only earned commission income on the entries provided by him. The Tribunal, considering previous rulings, treated the assessee as an Entry Operator and determined commission at 0.15% on the disputed amount. The AO was directed to charge commission accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
