Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The Delhi High Court addressed the cancellation of GST registration due to an alleged excess claim of Input Tax Credit. The court found that the order was based solely on the petitioner's lack of response, without considering evidence provided by the petitioner. The court ruled that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and that the Notice should be re-adjudicated in accordance with the law. The order of 21.12.2023 was set aside, and the Show Cause Notice was restored for further proceedings.
The Delhi High Court addressed the cancellation of GST registration due to an alleged excess claim of Input Tax Credit. The court found that the order was based solely on the petitioner's lack of response, without considering evidence provided by the petitioner. The court ruled that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and that the Notice should be re-adjudicated in accordance with the law. The order of 21.12.2023 was set aside, and the Show Cause Notice was restored for further proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
