Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi High Court addressed the cancellation of GST registration due to an alleged excess claim of Input Tax Credit. The court found that the order was based solely on the petitioner's lack of response, without considering evidence provided by the petitioner. The court ruled that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and that the Notice should be re-adjudicated in accordance with the law. The order of 21.12.2023 was set aside, and the Show Cause Notice was restored for further proceedings.
The Delhi High Court addressed the cancellation of GST registration due to an alleged excess claim of Input Tax Credit. The court found that the order was based solely on the petitioner's lack of response, without considering evidence provided by the petitioner. The court ruled that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and that the Notice should be re-adjudicated in accordance with the law. The order of 21.12.2023 was set aside, and the Show Cause Notice was restored for further proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
