Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The ITAT Delhi held that the merger of intimation/proceedings u/s 143(1) with regular assessment u/s 143(3) results in the intimation losing relevance once regular assessment is completed. The AO denied exemption u/s 11 due to non-filing of Form 10B, but the intimation u/s 143(1) only serves to verify information accuracy and does not carry the legitimacy of an assessment. The intimation merges with the regular assessment under u/s 143(3), making the appeal against the intimation infructuous. The eligibility for exemption u/s 11 post registration u/s 12A should be raised in the appeal against the regular assessment. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee, determining the demand raised in the 143(1) intimation as not sustainable.
The ITAT Delhi held that the merger of intimation/proceedings u/s 143(1) with regular assessment u/s 143(3) results in the intimation losing relevance once regular assessment is completed. The AO denied exemption u/s 11 due to non-filing of Form 10B, but the intimation u/s 143(1) only serves to verify information accuracy and does not carry the legitimacy of an assessment. The intimation merges with the regular assessment under u/s 143(3), making the appeal against the intimation infructuous. The eligibility for exemption u/s 11 post registration u/s 12A should be raised in the appeal against the regular assessment. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee, determining the demand raised in the 143(1) intimation as not sustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.