Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
CESTAT New Delhi ruled on the levy of service tax on income...
CESTAT New Delhi held that service tax on late delivery & non-execution of work as compensation is not applicable as per circular by Department of Revenue.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
CESTAT New Delhi ruled on the levy of service tax on income (compensation received) from late delivery of materials and non-execution of work. The appellant, engaged in electricity generation, was found to have provided a 'declared service' u/s 66E(e) of the Finance Act. The circular by the Department of Revenue clarified that there must be an express or implied agreement for taxable supply to exist, emphasizing the need for consideration in such agreements. The Tribunal's decisions in similar cases supported the appellant, leading to the dismissal of the department's appeal. The Service Tax Appeal by the appellant was allowed.
CESTAT New Delhi ruled on the levy of service tax on income (compensation received) from late delivery of materials and non-execution of work. The appellant, engaged in electricity generation, was found to have provided a 'declared service' u/s 66E(e) of the Finance Act. The circular by the Department of Revenue clarified that there must be an express or implied agreement for taxable supply to exist, emphasizing the need for consideration in such agreements. The Tribunal's decisions in similar cases supported the appellant, leading to the dismissal of the department's appeal. The Service Tax Appeal by the appellant was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
