Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Delhi held that the assessment u/s 144C(13) was time-barred, questioning the legality of the final assessment order. Referring to the case of GS Chatha Rice Mills, the crucial fact for the appeal was the date of uploading the DRP order onto the ITBA portal, which was unambiguously shown as 27th April 2022 in the intimation letter. All other submissions by the Respondents were considered, but the date of uploading the DRP order was deemed critical. As per section 144C(13), the assessment had to be completed by 31st May 2022, but in this case, it was finalized on 30th June 2022, making it time-barred and null. Consequently, the impugned assessment order dated 30th June 2022 was set aside as being barred by limitation, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
The ITAT Delhi held that the assessment u/s 144C(13) was time-barred, questioning the legality of the final assessment order. Referring to the case of GS Chatha Rice Mills, the crucial fact for the appeal was the date of uploading the DRP order onto the ITBA portal, which was unambiguously shown as 27th April 2022 in the intimation letter. All other submissions by the Respondents were considered, but the date of uploading the DRP order was deemed critical. As per section 144C(13), the assessment had to be completed by 31st May 2022, but in this case, it was finalized on 30th June 2022, making it time-barred and null. Consequently, the impugned assessment order dated 30th June 2022 was set aside as being barred by limitation, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
