Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The ITAT Mumbai upheld the disallowance made u/s. 80IA due to the assessee not claiming the deduction u/s. 80IA in response to the return filed u/s. 153A. The AO added bogus purchases, but the CIT(A) confirmed the addition while allowing deduction u/s. 80IA as the purchases were related to business activity. The AO applied gross profit rate to one party's purchases and deemed the other party's transactions as 'bogus,' leading to an increase in business income eligible for u/s. 80IA deduction. The ITAT relied on CBDT Circular No.37 of 2016 and past precedents, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision. The appeal was decided against the revenue.
The ITAT Mumbai upheld the disallowance made u/s. 80IA due to the assessee not claiming the deduction u/s. 80IA in response to the return filed u/s. 153A. The AO added bogus purchases, but the CIT(A) confirmed the addition while allowing deduction u/s. 80IA as the purchases were related to business activity. The AO applied gross profit rate to one party's purchases and deemed the other party's transactions as 'bogus,' leading to an increase in business income eligible for u/s. 80IA deduction. The ITAT relied on CBDT Circular No.37 of 2016 and past precedents, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision. The appeal was decided against the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
