Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT Kolkata ruled on the validity of an assessment order u/s 147. The jurisdictional AO did not issue a valid notice u/s 148. The assessee argued that the ACIT lacked jurisdiction and a fresh notice should have been issued by the correct authority. Since no such notice was issued, the assessment proceedings were deemed illegal and void ab initio. The ITAT held that without a valid notice u/s 148, the reassessment proceedings were bad in law and quashed them, deleting the additions made. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.
The ITAT Kolkata ruled on the validity of an assessment order u/s 147. The jurisdictional AO did not issue a valid notice u/s 148. The assessee argued that the ACIT lacked jurisdiction and a fresh notice should have been issued by the correct authority. Since no such notice was issued, the assessment proceedings were deemed illegal and void ab initio. The ITAT held that without a valid notice u/s 148, the reassessment proceedings were bad in law and quashed them, deleting the additions made. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
