Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
The ITAT Jodhpur ruled on additions made based on cash received for termination of a property purchase agreement and business expenses related to disputed agreements. The tribunal held that in the case of termination of the property agreement, the cash source was established as the property was not transferred due to non-payment by the assessee. Regarding the investment in property, the registered deed supported the claim, and objections were not raised. The business expenses were deemed legitimate and should be deducted from income. Grounds 3(a), (b), and (c) of the assessee were allowed.
The ITAT Jodhpur ruled on additions made based on cash received for termination of a property purchase agreement and business expenses related to disputed agreements. The tribunal held that in the case of termination of the property agreement, the cash source was established as the property was not transferred due to non-payment by the assessee. Regarding the investment in property, the registered deed supported the claim, and objections were not raised. The business expenses were deemed legitimate and should be deducted from income. Grounds 3(a), (b), and (c) of the assessee were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
