Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT Jodhpur ruled on additions made based on cash received for termination of a property purchase agreement and business expenses related to disputed agreements. The tribunal held that in the case of termination of the property agreement, the cash source was established as the property was not transferred due to non-payment by the assessee. Regarding the investment in property, the registered deed supported the claim, and objections were not raised. The business expenses were deemed legitimate and should be deducted from income. Grounds 3(a), (b), and (c) of the assessee were allowed.
The ITAT Jodhpur ruled on additions made based on cash received for termination of a property purchase agreement and business expenses related to disputed agreements. The tribunal held that in the case of termination of the property agreement, the cash source was established as the property was not transferred due to non-payment by the assessee. Regarding the investment in property, the registered deed supported the claim, and objections were not raised. The business expenses were deemed legitimate and should be deducted from income. Grounds 3(a), (b), and (c) of the assessee were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
