Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, addressed the validity of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a struck-off company. The Tribunal found that the company's revival status in the Master Data of the Corporate Debtor and non-compliance with the Companies Act did not absolve it of financial liabilities. Late claims post-approval of the Resolution Plan were not accepted, as confirmed by the Tribunal. The impact of settlement agreements on the Corporate Debtor's liability was also discussed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the continued obligation of the Corporate Debtor to discharge its financial debt despite claims to the contrary. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the order approving the Resolution Plan.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, addressed the validity of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a struck-off company. The Tribunal found that the company's revival status in the Master Data of the Corporate Debtor and non-compliance with the Companies Act did not absolve it of financial liabilities. Late claims post-approval of the Resolution Plan were not accepted, as confirmed by the Tribunal. The impact of settlement agreements on the Corporate Debtor's liability was also discussed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the continued obligation of the Corporate Debtor to discharge its financial debt despite claims to the contrary. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the order approving the Resolution Plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
