Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, addressed the validity of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a struck-off company. The Tribunal found that the company's revival status in the Master Data of the Corporate Debtor and non-compliance with the Companies Act did not absolve it of financial liabilities. Late claims post-approval of the Resolution Plan were not accepted, as confirmed by the Tribunal. The impact of settlement agreements on the Corporate Debtor's liability was also discussed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the continued obligation of the Corporate Debtor to discharge its financial debt despite claims to the contrary. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the order approving the Resolution Plan.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, addressed the validity of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a struck-off company. The Tribunal found that the company's revival status in the Master Data of the Corporate Debtor and non-compliance with the Companies Act did not absolve it of financial liabilities. Late claims post-approval of the Resolution Plan were not accepted, as confirmed by the Tribunal. The impact of settlement agreements on the Corporate Debtor's liability was also discussed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the continued obligation of the Corporate Debtor to discharge its financial debt despite claims to the contrary. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the order approving the Resolution Plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
