Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, addressed the validity of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a struck-off company. The Tribunal found that the company's revival status in the Master Data of the Corporate Debtor and non-compliance with the Companies Act did not absolve it of financial liabilities. Late claims post-approval of the Resolution Plan were not accepted, as confirmed by the Tribunal. The impact of settlement agreements on the Corporate Debtor's liability was also discussed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the continued obligation of the Corporate Debtor to discharge its financial debt despite claims to the contrary. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the order approving the Resolution Plan.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, addressed the validity of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a struck-off company. The Tribunal found that the company's revival status in the Master Data of the Corporate Debtor and non-compliance with the Companies Act did not absolve it of financial liabilities. Late claims post-approval of the Resolution Plan were not accepted, as confirmed by the Tribunal. The impact of settlement agreements on the Corporate Debtor's liability was also discussed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the continued obligation of the Corporate Debtor to discharge its financial debt despite claims to the contrary. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the order approving the Resolution Plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.