Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1097 before the ITAT Kolkata, the issue revolved around the addition made u/s 50C of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had contended that the fair market value of the property was lower than the value adopted by the stamp duty authority and requested a reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO) as per the provisions of section 50C. Both the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) rejected this contention without providing any reason, thereby not following the statutory provisions of section 50C(2). The ITAT held that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was not sustainable in law. Citing the decision in Hari Om Garg [2019 (5) TMI 1834 - ITAT Agra] and other High Court cases, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, ordering the deletion of the addition. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the addition made by the lower authorities was deemed unsustainable and ordered to be deleted.
In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1097 before the ITAT Kolkata, the issue revolved around the addition made u/s 50C of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had contended that the fair market value of the property was lower than the value adopted by the stamp duty authority and requested a reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO) as per the provisions of section 50C. Both the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) rejected this contention without providing any reason, thereby not following the statutory provisions of section 50C(2). The ITAT held that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was not sustainable in law. Citing the decision in Hari Om Garg [2019 (5) TMI 1834 - ITAT Agra] and other High Court cases, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, ordering the deletion of the addition. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the addition made by the lower authorities was deemed unsustainable and ordered to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
