Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2741 to 2760 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involves Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments and the classification of segments for benchmarking purposes. The Appellate Tribunal held that TP adjustments should be based on transactions with Associated Enterprises (AEs) only. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer/TPO to consider only the operating profit/cost of AE segments and to apply the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) for services rendered to AEs. The issue of using Resale Price Method (RPM) for the trading segment was also referred back to verify if value addition was made. The classification of the assessee as a manufacturing segment was questioned, and the Tribunal directed verification based on transaction volumes. The Tribunal agreed with the DRP that TP adjustments should be limited to AE transactions only when TNMM is adopted as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM). The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
The case involves Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments and the classification of segments for benchmarking purposes. The Appellate Tribunal held that TP adjustments should be based on transactions with Associated Enterprises (AEs) only. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer/TPO to consider only the operating profit/cost of AE segments and to apply the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) for services rendered to AEs. The issue of using Resale Price Method (RPM) for the trading segment was also referred back to verify if value addition was made. The classification of the assessee as a manufacturing segment was questioned, and the Tribunal directed verification based on transaction volumes. The Tribunal agreed with the DRP that TP adjustments should be limited to AE transactions only when TNMM is adopted as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM). The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
