Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1094 before the ITAT Mumbai, the issue revolved around the denial of exemption claimed u/s 54 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal acknowledged the challenges faced by house buyers in delayed construction projects. It was noted that the assessee had utilized only a portion of the Long Term Capital Gain for a new residential house. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to tax only the balance amount u/s 45, in line with the proviso to section 54(2) of the Act. The AO was instructed to allow exemption for the amount utilized for the new residential flat. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed on this ground.
In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1094 before the ITAT Mumbai, the issue revolved around the denial of exemption claimed u/s 54 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal acknowledged the challenges faced by house buyers in delayed construction projects. It was noted that the assessee had utilized only a portion of the Long Term Capital Gain for a new residential house. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to tax only the balance amount u/s 45, in line with the proviso to section 54(2) of the Act. The AO was instructed to allow exemption for the amount utilized for the new residential flat. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed on this ground.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
