Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1094 before the ITAT Mumbai, the issue revolved around the denial of exemption claimed u/s 54 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal acknowledged the challenges faced by house buyers in delayed construction projects. It was noted that the assessee had utilized only a portion of the Long Term Capital Gain for a new residential house. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to tax only the balance amount u/s 45, in line with the proviso to section 54(2) of the Act. The AO was instructed to allow exemption for the amount utilized for the new residential flat. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed on this ground.
In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1094 before the ITAT Mumbai, the issue revolved around the denial of exemption claimed u/s 54 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal acknowledged the challenges faced by house buyers in delayed construction projects. It was noted that the assessee had utilized only a portion of the Long Term Capital Gain for a new residential house. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to tax only the balance amount u/s 45, in line with the proviso to section 54(2) of the Act. The AO was instructed to allow exemption for the amount utilized for the new residential flat. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed on this ground.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4787
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
