Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee, who did not maintain books of accounts, received interest-free loans from Shri Anil Kumar Singh through normal banking transactions. The ITAT held that since the assessee did not maintain books of accounts, section 68 was not applicable. The assessee successfully proved the identity, creditworthiness of the lender, and the genuineness of the transaction by providing documents such as balance sheets and tax audit reports of the lender. The lender's tax audit balance sheets confirmed the loan amount, and the source of the source for the unsecured loan was not required to be proved. The lender's cash deposits were from available cash balances, and there were no adverse comments by the Tax Auditor. The loan to the assessee was reflected in the lender's audited balance sheet, establishing the genuineness of the transaction and the creditworthiness of the lender.
Addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee, who did not maintain books of accounts, received interest-free loans from Shri Anil Kumar Singh through normal banking transactions. The ITAT held that since the assessee did not maintain books of accounts, section 68 was not applicable. The assessee successfully proved the identity, creditworthiness of the lender, and the genuineness of the transaction by providing documents such as balance sheets and tax audit reports of the lender. The lender's tax audit balance sheets confirmed the loan amount, and the source of the source for the unsecured loan was not required to be proved. The lender's cash deposits were from available cash balances, and there were no adverse comments by the Tax Auditor. The loan to the assessee was reflected in the lender's audited balance sheet, establishing the genuineness of the transaction and the creditworthiness of the lender.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.