Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
In the case before ITAT Chennai, the issue of disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D was considered. The CIT(A) found that no exempt income was earned by the assessee, leading to full relief being granted. The order of the CIT(A) and AO regarding disallowance was set aside, directing the AO to delete the addition from the total income. Regarding TDS u/s 195 for listing charges paid to Bank of New York, it was noted that DTAA provisions were not considered. The AO was directed to re-examine the issue in light of DTAA provisions. The claim of prior period expenditure was dismissed as it cannot be allowed in the assessment of a specific year. The writing off of carbon income was remanded to the AO for re-examination based on past treatment by the Department. The issue was decided in favor of the assessee for statistical purposes only.
In the case before ITAT Chennai, the issue of disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D was considered. The CIT(A) found that no exempt income was earned by the assessee, leading to full relief being granted. The order of the CIT(A) and AO regarding disallowance was set aside, directing the AO to delete the addition from the total income. Regarding TDS u/s 195 for listing charges paid to Bank of New York, it was noted that DTAA provisions were not considered. The AO was directed to re-examine the issue in light of DTAA provisions. The claim of prior period expenditure was dismissed as it cannot be allowed in the assessment of a specific year. The writing off of carbon income was remanded to the AO for re-examination based on past treatment by the Department. The issue was decided in favor of the assessee for statistical purposes only.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
