Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The Madhya Pradesh High Court directed the Respondent to release the original documents seized from the Petitioner's premises within 30 days of issuing the show cause notice, as per u/s 67(3) of the CGST Act and u/r 27 of the Central Excise Rules 2017. The Petitioner is entitled to both certified copies of relied documents and original copies of non-relied documents for a fair defense. The court emphasized the Petitioner's right to cross-examine witnesses relied upon in the show cause notices to ensure a fair hearing and adherence to principles of natural justice. The Respondents were ordered to provide all original seized documents to the Petitioner for preparing a reply, thereby allowing the petition.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court directed the Respondent to release the original documents seized from the Petitioner's premises within 30 days of issuing the show cause notice, as per u/s 67(3) of the CGST Act and u/r 27 of the Central Excise Rules 2017. The Petitioner is entitled to both certified copies of relied documents and original copies of non-relied documents for a fair defense. The court emphasized the Petitioner's right to cross-examine witnesses relied upon in the show cause notices to ensure a fair hearing and adherence to principles of natural justice. The Respondents were ordered to provide all original seized documents to the Petitioner for preparing a reply, thereby allowing the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.