Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Surat dealt with a case involving unexplained credit u/s 68. The assessee received a commission of 0.50% per Rs. 100 but failed to provide details of transactions or persons involved. The Tribunal noted the absence of specific details and the peculiar nature of the business. Previous cases were cited where additions were restricted to 0.125% to 0.35%. Following a consistent approach, the Tribunal limited the addition to Rs. 75 per lakh, equivalent to 0.75% for Rs. 100. The total credit in the bank account was found to be Rs. 2.07 crores after considering cheque and cash deposits. The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, directing the assessing officer to adjust the assessment accordingly.
The ITAT Surat dealt with a case involving unexplained credit u/s 68. The assessee received a commission of 0.50% per Rs. 100 but failed to provide details of transactions or persons involved. The Tribunal noted the absence of specific details and the peculiar nature of the business. Previous cases were cited where additions were restricted to 0.125% to 0.35%. Following a consistent approach, the Tribunal limited the addition to Rs. 75 per lakh, equivalent to 0.75% for Rs. 100. The total credit in the bank account was found to be Rs. 2.07 crores after considering cheque and cash deposits. The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, directing the assessing officer to adjust the assessment accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
