Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The ITAT Hyderabad addressed a Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment issue regarding interest on outstanding receivables, determining if it constitutes an international transaction. Referring to the amendment to Section 92B of the Act by the Finance Act, 2012, the Tribunal held that interest on outstanding receivables is indeed an international transaction requiring separate benchmarking. The Tribunal noted that the DRP directed the AO to use the SBI short-term deposit interest rate as the Arm's Length Price (ALP) interest rate and adjust income based on a credit period of thirty days or as per the agreement/invoice. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to compute the interest rate on similar foreign currency receivables/advances as LIBOR+200 points, applying the appropriate credit period. The Tribunal allowed the grounds in part, emphasizing the need for accurate computation and adherence to the specified credit period.
The ITAT Hyderabad addressed a Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment issue regarding interest on outstanding receivables, determining if it constitutes an international transaction. Referring to the amendment to Section 92B of the Act by the Finance Act, 2012, the Tribunal held that interest on outstanding receivables is indeed an international transaction requiring separate benchmarking. The Tribunal noted that the DRP directed the AO to use the SBI short-term deposit interest rate as the Arm's Length Price (ALP) interest rate and adjust income based on a credit period of thirty days or as per the agreement/invoice. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to compute the interest rate on similar foreign currency receivables/advances as LIBOR+200 points, applying the appropriate credit period. The Tribunal allowed the grounds in part, emphasizing the need for accurate computation and adherence to the specified credit period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
