Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
The ITAT Delhi ruled on an appeal regarding addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee explained that the deposits were from sale proceeds and past savings. The tribunal held that the AO did not find any discrepancies in the recorded purchases, sales, and stocks. Without evidence of non-genuine transactions or book rejection, assuming cash deposits based on higher turnover is unjustified. Therefore, the addition u/s 68 was deleted in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT Delhi ruled on an appeal regarding addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee explained that the deposits were from sale proceeds and past savings. The tribunal held that the AO did not find any discrepancies in the recorded purchases, sales, and stocks. Without evidence of non-genuine transactions or book rejection, assuming cash deposits based on higher turnover is unjustified. Therefore, the addition u/s 68 was deleted in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
