Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that in a case involving undervaluation of timber imports, the burden of proof lies on the authorities to establish duty demand, penalty, and interest. Referring to the Beena Sales Corporation case, where similar evidence was relied upon, the Tribunal found the decision applicable and upheld by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the impugned orders were deemed unsustainable and set aside, with all appeals allowed and consequential relief granted.
CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that in a case involving undervaluation of timber imports, the burden of proof lies on the authorities to establish duty demand, penalty, and interest. Referring to the Beena Sales Corporation case, where similar evidence was relied upon, the Tribunal found the decision applicable and upheld by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the impugned orders were deemed unsustainable and set aside, with all appeals allowed and consequential relief granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
