Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT Delhi ruled on TDS u/s 194H and 194J regarding income/profit component in payments to distributors/franchisees. The payment cannot be treated as commission or brokerage. Citing Bharti Cellular Ltd. case, it held no legal obligation for TDS on such payments. Section 194-H deemed inapplicable, leading to setting aside of the demand u/s 201(1)/201(1A). Appellant's appeal allowed based on established legal principles.
The ITAT Delhi ruled on TDS u/s 194H and 194J regarding income/profit component in payments to distributors/franchisees. The payment cannot be treated as commission or brokerage. Citing Bharti Cellular Ltd. case, it held no legal obligation for TDS on such payments. Section 194-H deemed inapplicable, leading to setting aside of the demand u/s 201(1)/201(1A). Appellant's appeal allowed based on established legal principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
