Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The ITAT Delhi ruled on TDS u/s 194H and 194J regarding income/profit component in payments to distributors/franchisees. The payment cannot be treated as commission or brokerage. Citing Bharti Cellular Ltd. case, it held no legal obligation for TDS on such payments. Section 194-H deemed inapplicable, leading to setting aside of the demand u/s 201(1)/201(1A). Appellant's appeal allowed based on established legal principles.
The ITAT Delhi ruled on TDS u/s 194H and 194J regarding income/profit component in payments to distributors/franchisees. The payment cannot be treated as commission or brokerage. Citing Bharti Cellular Ltd. case, it held no legal obligation for TDS on such payments. Section 194-H deemed inapplicable, leading to setting aside of the demand u/s 201(1)/201(1A). Appellant's appeal allowed based on established legal principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.