Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involved a challenge to the time limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the UPGST Act. The High Court held that limitation provisions in tax laws serve to ensure timely compliance, discourage delays, and promote equal treatment of taxpayers. The petitioner received the order on July 12, 2022, and filed the appeal on November 10, 2022. The court found errors in the calculation of the time limit by the authorities, warranting the exercise of writ jurisdiction. The court directed the appellate authority to allow the delay in filing the appeal and proceed to hear the appeal on merits promptly, preferably within two months. The application was disposed of accordingly.
The case involved a challenge to the time limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the UPGST Act. The High Court held that limitation provisions in tax laws serve to ensure timely compliance, discourage delays, and promote equal treatment of taxpayers. The petitioner received the order on July 12, 2022, and filed the appeal on November 10, 2022. The court found errors in the calculation of the time limit by the authorities, warranting the exercise of writ jurisdiction. The court directed the appellate authority to allow the delay in filing the appeal and proceed to hear the appeal on merits promptly, preferably within two months. The application was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
