Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case before the Allahabad High Court involved the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by the assessing authority based on information that the purchaser did not exist. The court held that the decision to initiate reassessment was based on relevant information and the suggestion of income escapement. The non-existence of the purchaser was supported by the purchaser's lack of response to notices and statements from a third party. The court noted that the existence of the purchaser company on the MCA portal was not a mandatory condition for reassessment. The court emphasized that the assessing officer's decision to initiate reassessment was based on the information received and the suggestion of income escapement, rather than a strict "reason to believe" requirement. The court dismissed the writ petition, allowing the assessment proceedings to continue in accordance with the law.
The case before the Allahabad High Court involved the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by the assessing authority based on information that the purchaser did not exist. The court held that the decision to initiate reassessment was based on relevant information and the suggestion of income escapement. The non-existence of the purchaser was supported by the purchaser's lack of response to notices and statements from a third party. The court noted that the existence of the purchaser company on the MCA portal was not a mandatory condition for reassessment. The court emphasized that the assessing officer's decision to initiate reassessment was based on the information received and the suggestion of income escapement, rather than a strict "reason to believe" requirement. The court dismissed the writ petition, allowing the assessment proceedings to continue in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.