Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3321 to 3340 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involves a dispute regarding the deduction claim u/s 80P of the Income Tax Act by a cooperative society based on Notification No. SRO 1800 issued under the repealed Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the introduction of Section 80P specifically for cooperative societies supersedes the previous notification. The Tribunal emphasized that deduction/exemption provisions are similar and that the notification stands withdrawn as per Section 297 of the Act. The Tribunal referred to relevant case law and concluded that the cooperative society is not eligible for the claimed benefit under Section 80P as it does not meet the necessary criteria. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed based on these findings.
The case involves a dispute regarding the deduction claim u/s 80P of the Income Tax Act by a cooperative society based on Notification No. SRO 1800 issued under the repealed Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the introduction of Section 80P specifically for cooperative societies supersedes the previous notification. The Tribunal emphasized that deduction/exemption provisions are similar and that the notification stands withdrawn as per Section 297 of the Act. The Tribunal referred to relevant case law and concluded that the cooperative society is not eligible for the claimed benefit under Section 80P as it does not meet the necessary criteria. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed based on these findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
