Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT Indore ruled on the validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 based on information from DDIT (Inv.)-Unit 2(2), Kolkata alleging sham transactions with a shell company. Assessee consistently denied such transactions. Tribunal found no evidence of transactions with the alleged shell company, rendering the reassessment invalid. The AO cannot make new additions unrelated to original reasons u/s 147. The 3rd Proviso restricts AO to reassess only matters not subject to appeal, reference, or revision. Relying on Jet Airways case, the reassessment order was quashed, and the assessee succeeded in the appeal.
The ITAT Indore ruled on the validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 based on information from DDIT (Inv.)-Unit 2(2), Kolkata alleging sham transactions with a shell company. Assessee consistently denied such transactions. Tribunal found no evidence of transactions with the alleged shell company, rendering the reassessment invalid. The AO cannot make new additions unrelated to original reasons u/s 147. The 3rd Proviso restricts AO to reassess only matters not subject to appeal, reference, or revision. Relying on Jet Airways case, the reassessment order was quashed, and the assessee succeeded in the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
