Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The Bombay High Court addressed non-compliance with Rule 28 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 regarding timely registration and disposal of applications u/s 94 and 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It noted extreme delays in compliance with objections and in declining matters for non-compliance, leading to unreasonable continuance of interim moratorium against personal guarantors. Applications were declined after significant delays, indicating prolonged moratorium periods. The court emphasized the importance of timely compliance with rules and dismissed the petition, highlighting the need to follow due process for refiled applications.
The Bombay High Court addressed non-compliance with Rule 28 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 regarding timely registration and disposal of applications u/s 94 and 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It noted extreme delays in compliance with objections and in declining matters for non-compliance, leading to unreasonable continuance of interim moratorium against personal guarantors. Applications were declined after significant delays, indicating prolonged moratorium periods. The court emphasized the importance of timely compliance with rules and dismissed the petition, highlighting the need to follow due process for refiled applications.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
