Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Calcutta High Court considered a Revision Application regarding the seizure of goods from duty-free shops at an international airport, deemed outside India's territory. Citing the Supreme Court's precedent, the court quashed the proceedings as the complainant lacked authority to initiate them for offenses outside India's customs frontiers. The court allowed the revision, quashing the proceedings under u/s 36(1) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 u/r 32(3) of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011.
The Calcutta High Court considered a Revision Application regarding the seizure of goods from duty-free shops at an international airport, deemed outside India's territory. Citing the Supreme Court's precedent, the court quashed the proceedings as the complainant lacked authority to initiate them for offenses outside India's customs frontiers. The court allowed the revision, quashing the proceedings under u/s 36(1) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 u/r 32(3) of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
