Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Karnataka High Court examined a case involving misappropriation of money collected from punters for GST and TDS payments. The court held that the allegations in the FIR disclosed a cognizable offense, rejecting the petitioners' argument that the police procedure was contrary to legal principles. The court emphasized that Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code should not be used to thwart a legitimate prosecution. The court found that the allegations and evidence collected during the investigation established a prima facie case of a cognizable offense, including serious allegations of misappropriation of funds. Consequently, the petition to quash the FIR was dismissed, allowing the investigation to proceed.
The Karnataka High Court examined a case involving misappropriation of money collected from punters for GST and TDS payments. The court held that the allegations in the FIR disclosed a cognizable offense, rejecting the petitioners' argument that the police procedure was contrary to legal principles. The court emphasized that Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code should not be used to thwart a legitimate prosecution. The court found that the allegations and evidence collected during the investigation established a prima facie case of a cognizable offense, including serious allegations of misappropriation of funds. Consequently, the petition to quash the FIR was dismissed, allowing the investigation to proceed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
