Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving an ex-parte demand due to the petitioner's failure to respond to a Show Cause Notice (SCN) u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner couldn't reply as their business was closed. The court set aside the impugned order, restored the SCN, and directed the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks. The Proper Officer was instructed to re-adjudicate the matter, provide a personal hearing, and issue a fresh order within the prescribed period u/s 75(3) of the Act. Petition disposed off.
The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving an ex-parte demand due to the petitioner's failure to respond to a Show Cause Notice (SCN) u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner couldn't reply as their business was closed. The court set aside the impugned order, restored the SCN, and directed the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks. The Proper Officer was instructed to re-adjudicate the matter, provide a personal hearing, and issue a fresh order within the prescribed period u/s 75(3) of the Act. Petition disposed off.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
