Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving an ex-parte demand due to the petitioner's failure to respond to a Show Cause Notice (SCN) u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner couldn't reply as their business was closed. The court set aside the impugned order, restored the SCN, and directed the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks. The Proper Officer was instructed to re-adjudicate the matter, provide a personal hearing, and issue a fresh order within the prescribed period u/s 75(3) of the Act. Petition disposed off.
The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving an ex-parte demand due to the petitioner's failure to respond to a Show Cause Notice (SCN) u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner couldn't reply as their business was closed. The court set aside the impugned order, restored the SCN, and directed the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks. The Proper Officer was instructed to re-adjudicate the matter, provide a personal hearing, and issue a fresh order within the prescribed period u/s 75(3) of the Act. Petition disposed off.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
