Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
The ITAT Ahmedabad considered rectification u/s 154 for correct assessment year of DDT. Revenue argued DDT pertained to A.Y. 2014-15, but Section 115-O(3) mandates DDT payment when dividend is declared. DDT must be accounted for in the year it was paid. Assessee rectified Form 3CD for A.Y. 2014-15 and 2015-16 to correct DDT accounting error. CIT(A) rejected revised form, stating it should have been filed before end of relevant assessment year. However, as dividend declaration and DDT payment occurred in A.Y. 2015-16, DDT should be accounted for in A.Y. 2015-16. Assessee's appeal allowed.
The ITAT Ahmedabad considered rectification u/s 154 for correct assessment year of DDT. Revenue argued DDT pertained to A.Y. 2014-15, but Section 115-O(3) mandates DDT payment when dividend is declared. DDT must be accounted for in the year it was paid. Assessee rectified Form 3CD for A.Y. 2014-15 and 2015-16 to correct DDT accounting error. CIT(A) rejected revised form, stating it should have been filed before end of relevant assessment year. However, as dividend declaration and DDT payment occurred in A.Y. 2015-16, DDT should be accounted for in A.Y. 2015-16. Assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
