Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Ahmedabad considered rectification u/s 154 for correct assessment year of DDT. Revenue argued DDT pertained to A.Y. 2014-15, but Section 115-O(3) mandates DDT payment when dividend is declared. DDT must be accounted for in the year it was paid. Assessee rectified Form 3CD for A.Y. 2014-15 and 2015-16 to correct DDT accounting error. CIT(A) rejected revised form, stating it should have been filed before end of relevant assessment year. However, as dividend declaration and DDT payment occurred in A.Y. 2015-16, DDT should be accounted for in A.Y. 2015-16. Assessee's appeal allowed.
The ITAT Ahmedabad considered rectification u/s 154 for correct assessment year of DDT. Revenue argued DDT pertained to A.Y. 2014-15, but Section 115-O(3) mandates DDT payment when dividend is declared. DDT must be accounted for in the year it was paid. Assessee rectified Form 3CD for A.Y. 2014-15 and 2015-16 to correct DDT accounting error. CIT(A) rejected revised form, stating it should have been filed before end of relevant assessment year. However, as dividend declaration and DDT payment occurred in A.Y. 2015-16, DDT should be accounted for in A.Y. 2015-16. Assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
