Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT Ahmedabad considered rectification u/s 154 for correct assessment year of DDT. Revenue argued DDT pertained to A.Y. 2014-15, but Section 115-O(3) mandates DDT payment when dividend is declared. DDT must be accounted for in the year it was paid. Assessee rectified Form 3CD for A.Y. 2014-15 and 2015-16 to correct DDT accounting error. CIT(A) rejected revised form, stating it should have been filed before end of relevant assessment year. However, as dividend declaration and DDT payment occurred in A.Y. 2015-16, DDT should be accounted for in A.Y. 2015-16. Assessee's appeal allowed.
The ITAT Ahmedabad considered rectification u/s 154 for correct assessment year of DDT. Revenue argued DDT pertained to A.Y. 2014-15, but Section 115-O(3) mandates DDT payment when dividend is declared. DDT must be accounted for in the year it was paid. Assessee rectified Form 3CD for A.Y. 2014-15 and 2015-16 to correct DDT accounting error. CIT(A) rejected revised form, stating it should have been filed before end of relevant assessment year. However, as dividend declaration and DDT payment occurred in A.Y. 2015-16, DDT should be accounted for in A.Y. 2015-16. Assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
