Trademark depreciation and section 14A adjustments: ITAT applies consistency, independent book-profit computation, and no disallowance without exempt ...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4641 to 4660 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Rajasthan High Court held that the petition challenging an assessment order was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed time u/s 107 of the RGST Act, 2017/CGST Act, 2017. Citing the Glaxo Smith Kline case, the court emphasized that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked if the statutory remedy of appeal is foreclosed by limitation. The petitioner deliberately did not file an appeal and approached the court after the order became final. As no valid explanation was provided for not availing the statutory appeal remedy, the court dismissed the writ petition following the Supreme Court's precedent.
The Rajasthan High Court held that the petition challenging an assessment order was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed time u/s 107 of the RGST Act, 2017/CGST Act, 2017. Citing the Glaxo Smith Kline case, the court emphasized that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked if the statutory remedy of appeal is foreclosed by limitation. The petitioner deliberately did not file an appeal and approached the court after the order became final. As no valid explanation was provided for not availing the statutory appeal remedy, the court dismissed the writ petition following the Supreme Court's precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
