Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the issue of refund of excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) and entitlement to interest on delayed refund. The petitioner's application for refund of excess ITC from 2010-11 to 2013-14 was rejected, directing them to apply from the relevant year. The court held that interest on the refund accrued from the date of the first application (27.11.2020) and should have been paid after sixty days. The subsequent assessment proceedings did not affect the petitioner's right to interest on the accrued amount. The court allowed the petition, directing payment of interest on the refunded amount.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the issue of refund of excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) and entitlement to interest on delayed refund. The petitioner's application for refund of excess ITC from 2010-11 to 2013-14 was rejected, directing them to apply from the relevant year. The court held that interest on the refund accrued from the date of the first application (27.11.2020) and should have been paid after sixty days. The subsequent assessment proceedings did not affect the petitioner's right to interest on the accrued amount. The court allowed the petition, directing payment of interest on the refunded amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
